10 Questions Every CMO Should Ask Their CTO
30 avril 2025 • 3 Minute Read • Elizabeth Spranzani, Chef de la direction technologique
Marketing leaders are under pressure to adopt AI while remaining accountable for revenue, efficiency, and brand trust. As pressure mounts, so does tension, and many teams find themselves caught between experimentation and execution, unsure whether there's an ROI.
Research from McKinsey & Company underscores this tension. While the majority of organizations now use AI in at least one business function, fewer than half report any measurable impact on EBIT. Most of those gains account for less than 5% of enterprise earnings. Widespread adoption hasn't translated into proportional business impact.
Agentic AI is often positioned as the next leap forward in marketing technology. However, most explanations focus on what it is, not how it creates business value, or why it frequently fails in practice.
This article provides a practical, executive-level perspective on agentic AI for CMOs and VPs of Marketing, grounded in real operational constraints and measurable outcomes.
Agentic AI differs from other AI tools marketers already use, adding more value at scale.
Agentic AI refers to systems that can:
Unlike generative AI tools that respond to individual prompts, agentic AI operates as a persistent sense, decide, and act loop.
Taken together, these capabilities allow agentic AI to accumulate organizational context over time, surface meaningful patterns, and then act on them by raising alerts, initiating follow-on analysis, or generating outputs to close gaps.
Most marketing AI today falls into two categories:
Agentic AI sits between intelligence and execution. It’s designed to pursue outcomes, not just outputs, which makes it powerful but also more complex to deploy responsibly. Because it’s not limited to rigid rules, it adapts to ambiguity and exceptions, where traditional automation tends to fail.
Agentic AI is gaining traction not because marketing teams lack ideas, but because decision velocity has become a structural bottleneck.
Most marketing teams have plenty of ideas, but they struggle with:
Agentic AI addresses these challenges by maintaining context across complex systems and acting faster than human meeting cycles allow.
Digital and demand leaders often believe in the promise of agentic AI but lack clarity on where to start.
Marketing leaders typically ask:
Agentic AI shouldn’t be deployed as an add-on, and its most effective starting point isn't content creation.
Instead, agentic AI changes how decisions flow through the organization. It’s signal interpretation and follow-through.
For example, noticing when demo requests spike but sales follow-up slows, or when paid spend increases without corresponding pipeline movement, then triggering an investigation or action immediately.
If a team cannot clearly identify the decision an agent is accelerating, it’s not the right starting use case.
From a technology leadership standpoint, agentic AI raises important questions about control, safety, and predictability.
Executing actions across systems introduces risk related to:
Agentic AI should be treated like a junior operator:
Trust is built through transparency and accountability, not intelligence alone.
CMOs are accountable for measurable outcomes, not experimentation for its own sake.
One of the most common mistakes in AI adoption is equating time saved with value created. In marketing, time saved often leads to more activity rather than better outcomes.
Agentic AI creates value only when freed capacity is intentionally converted into the following:
If these outcomes are not explicitly defined in planning, ROI will remain invisible.
Agentic AI initiatives often break down when faster execution collides with approval bottlenecks, data trust issues, and handoffs.
Most marketing organizations are constrained by internal or cross-functional bottlenecks, including:
When execution is accelerated without addressing these constraints, a backlog is created rather than growth.
The correct question to ask isn’t where an agent can do more work. It's what currently limits throughput. Agentic AI should be applied directly to that constraint.
From a long-term strategy perspective, agentic AI changes the competitive landscape.
As agentic AI capabilities become widely available, faster execution alone will no longer be a competitive advantage.
Competitive differentiation shifts to:
Most initiatives fail because they prioritize activity over impact. A disciplined approach to adoption prevents agentic AI from becoming performative.
Agentic AI isn’t about doing more marketing. It’s about making better decisions faster and realizing their economic impact.
The teams that succeed will not be those with the most agents. They will be the teams that understand their constraints, govern autonomy thoughtfully, and reinvest capacity with intent.
Used this way, agentic AI becomes a growth lever rather than another layer of complexity.
If you’re exploring where would agentic AI could materially change outcomes or may —or where it may introduce risk—our team helps marketing and technology leaders evaluate opportunities, constraints, and governance before tools ever enter the conversation. Contact us to learn more.